I don't want violent riots. I don't want a civil war. I do want this Government out as quickly as possible, and I don't mean we have GOT to give them another four years to really screw our society into wreckage first. There has got to be a civilized way to precipitate an earlier election. They have got to go. They have got to go. Some relatively sane and socially responsible, and awake and aware, politicians from somewhere have got to be put in charge before it's the biggest meltdown Western Civilization has seen in generations. One way or another, they have got to go. They have got to go. What do we have to do, that is legal and sensible but firm and insistent? What??
I agree. They want civil unrest. They wrongly believe that scenes of violence will turn people away from Reform. They are wrong. The UK is currently in the midst of a preference cascade, with a huge chunk of mostly moderate people realising that this cannot go on, and that our country is being destroyed by do-gooders who look at top level statistics and opine with their fellow highly educated types that at a UK population level, the rise in rapes and sexual assaults is only incrementally higher, and is offset by the net positive good being done by their policy. Of course, this is no help at all at the granular local level where a father is likely to worry about the increased risk to his daughter from the newly opened 150 person migrant hotel in the local vicinity.
Mixed in with all this is some staggering assumptions made about the veracity of asylum claims, given the evidence from countries with a more stringent system of vetting which have far higher rates of rejection of asylum claims, an underlying Open Society ethos, and seeing nothing wrong with giving asylum seekers preferential treatment and luxury taxpayer funded 'gifts' whilst British veterans struggle with the cost of living, British homeless clog our streets, and most Brits cannot get access to the NHS dentists which are sent to migrant hotels on a regular basis.
They don't realise that Britain is undergoing a preference cascade. Nice middle class people in sleepy Shires who normally wouldn't voice anything which is even mildly offensive are waking up and voicing concerns in in-person conversations. Sure, they won't like riots, and will likely condemn them if asked, but it won't change their mind when it comes to mass migration and it won't change their mind at the ballot box. British people are no longer afraid of being associated with a few thousand people at the extreme end of the debate- either that or they are willing to hold their noses to get this country back on the right track.
One of the things which needs to be added to the Reform manifesto is retraining 10,000 or so of the 200,000 additional civil servants the government hired during the pandemic to administer lie detector and AI supervised interviews. We should take in those fleeing war and genuine political persecution but evidence from other countries shows this is generally only 20% of all applicants. Although Sweden didn't go this far, their stronger vetting after the Sweden Democrats entered into a power-sharing agreement with Sweden's main conservative party saw the number of asylum seekers applying to Sweden plummet. The 10,00 number includes the capacity to look at backdated cases, as well as screen current visa holders for potential risks to public safety.
Beyond that we need a two-tier system for social spending, beyond immediate medical needs. If you were born British, had a British parent when you were a child, or spent a majority of your childhood growing up in the UK, you should continue under the current system. In all other circumstances including housing, government aid of any kind should be strictly contributions-based. A huge amount of what is drawing people to the UK is incentives. If they can see people on TikTok getting houses or extended stays in four star hotels and free money, why wouldn't they want to come?
Inward legal migration should be limited to people earning over £50,000 a year. The top 20% of taxpayers pay an average of £35,000 more in taxes than they take out. Quite frankly, our stretched and strained public services need the money, and our economy needs the wealth creation.
To be honest, strict but fair should have been our policy all along.
Yeah, prayer did so much for humanity at an extremely religious time when the Black Death was wiping out half the population, how about that for a practical solution? No, not really. Anyway, I suspect that what is wanted by "the powers that be" is a compliant population that falls into their belief structures about the post-war consensus on an open society, not one that cares about borders and their own culture and being realistic about Islamism and the European Union. I suspect they're too stupid to actually want violence or war - they would look around and say "how did that happen? Oh dear, must be the Far Right. Can't be my fault, guv".
1. And you Know Prayer never worked in the 14th century. Wasn't aware you are an Expert on 14th century European history. I stand corrected (/snark)
2. For Materialist/Atheist view (which alas is all to common) it seem not to be. BUT for Believers it is A very practical solution. It is said no (18th century) religious revival in The Colonies, No American Revolution.
And a question for those Non-Believers. How's that walking away from God i(n the last 100+ years) workin out for you? Society getting better/freer?
May I recommend
The Real Reason Our Culture Is Falling Apart | Stephen Meyer Explains
Today's video is a reflection on the 40th anniversary of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s chilling speech, "Men Have Forgotten God." There are many sobering parallels between the collapse of spiritual life in Soviet Russia and today’s cultural crisis in America like how the rise of materialism, scientific atheism and nihilistic worldviews are contributing to a decline in faith especially among Gen Z. If you've ever wondered why belief in God seems to be fading, and what can be done about it, this is a conversation you can’t afford to miss.
3. Give It (Prayer) A Shot! What Have You Got To Lose?
I responded to a post on FB where a woman had flown from the US to Ireland to meet a guy. After reading SO MANY comments about how she should stay there because the US was so bad, I posted asking if any of those people had been paying attention to what is actually going on over there. The fact that hotels were being filled by the government with immigrants, thereby affecting tourism, while veterans lived homeless in the streets. Attacks by immigrants against children. Irish matching against the government for implementing policies not in alignment with the populace. Free speech disappearing -especially online. The two-tiered justice system.
Got quite a few responses from people in Scotland and Britain backing me up. Got way more telling me I should start writing fiction for Hollywood, that...yeah...some people are prejudice but no real Irish person was upset.
The posts backing me up are now gone. But everyday I receive notice someone has -once again - posted that I'm wrong and the US could learn from the EU and Ireland.
Where does the impulse for this kind of legislation come from? Polls confirm it can't be from voters, yet voters elect candidates for public office who routinely impose unwanted laws on them. This raises an obvious question about the set of candidates from which voters are expected to choose: why is it limited to candidates who are almost guaranteed, if elected, to legislate in ways inimical to voters' best interests, as the voters themselves perceive them? There's something wrong, not with voters' judgment but with a system in which the criteria that need to be satisfied in order to get one's name on an election ballot have nothing to do with what voters want.
So if I understand this correctly, Section 44 gives government ministers (elected or unelected bureaucrats?) authority to change the rules on how the Online Safety Act is implemented. Sounds more like Animal Farm than 1984. In the U.S. the EPA gets to make decisions like that. And over the last few years I've been buying products, though not illegal, that are known by the State of Kalifornia to cause cancer. I guess I won't be using my lawn mower in Kalifornia...
Those of us who left the UK are mourning for you. We tried to warn you though, I posted over and over not to vote for Labour. But so many did to “Teach the Conservatives a lesson“. They needed a lesson but you didn’t need Labour.
The UK must find a way to get this Labour government out of power.
There are three justice benchmarks to watch for in ‘soviet’ YooKay.
Lucy Connolly’s 30 months without parole for a hastily deleted tweet.
The sentences for Amaaz and his brother for the Manchester Airport.
The sentence for Labour Councillor Ricky Jones wanting to ‘cut the throats’ of protesters.
If the latter two are anything less than 30 months …..
Thanks, KK. Very important and appropriate article. Totally spot on.
I don't want violent riots. I don't want a civil war. I do want this Government out as quickly as possible, and I don't mean we have GOT to give them another four years to really screw our society into wreckage first. There has got to be a civilized way to precipitate an earlier election. They have got to go. They have got to go. Some relatively sane and socially responsible, and awake and aware, politicians from somewhere have got to be put in charge before it's the biggest meltdown Western Civilization has seen in generations. One way or another, they have got to go. They have got to go. What do we have to do, that is legal and sensible but firm and insistent? What??
"I don't want violent riots. I don't want a civil war"
It appears to me This is just what The Powers That Be Want. They are doing everything they can to provoke it.
May I (seriously) suggest...PRAYER.
I agree. They want civil unrest. They wrongly believe that scenes of violence will turn people away from Reform. They are wrong. The UK is currently in the midst of a preference cascade, with a huge chunk of mostly moderate people realising that this cannot go on, and that our country is being destroyed by do-gooders who look at top level statistics and opine with their fellow highly educated types that at a UK population level, the rise in rapes and sexual assaults is only incrementally higher, and is offset by the net positive good being done by their policy. Of course, this is no help at all at the granular local level where a father is likely to worry about the increased risk to his daughter from the newly opened 150 person migrant hotel in the local vicinity.
Mixed in with all this is some staggering assumptions made about the veracity of asylum claims, given the evidence from countries with a more stringent system of vetting which have far higher rates of rejection of asylum claims, an underlying Open Society ethos, and seeing nothing wrong with giving asylum seekers preferential treatment and luxury taxpayer funded 'gifts' whilst British veterans struggle with the cost of living, British homeless clog our streets, and most Brits cannot get access to the NHS dentists which are sent to migrant hotels on a regular basis.
They don't realise that Britain is undergoing a preference cascade. Nice middle class people in sleepy Shires who normally wouldn't voice anything which is even mildly offensive are waking up and voicing concerns in in-person conversations. Sure, they won't like riots, and will likely condemn them if asked, but it won't change their mind when it comes to mass migration and it won't change their mind at the ballot box. British people are no longer afraid of being associated with a few thousand people at the extreme end of the debate- either that or they are willing to hold their noses to get this country back on the right track.
One of the things which needs to be added to the Reform manifesto is retraining 10,000 or so of the 200,000 additional civil servants the government hired during the pandemic to administer lie detector and AI supervised interviews. We should take in those fleeing war and genuine political persecution but evidence from other countries shows this is generally only 20% of all applicants. Although Sweden didn't go this far, their stronger vetting after the Sweden Democrats entered into a power-sharing agreement with Sweden's main conservative party saw the number of asylum seekers applying to Sweden plummet. The 10,00 number includes the capacity to look at backdated cases, as well as screen current visa holders for potential risks to public safety.
Beyond that we need a two-tier system for social spending, beyond immediate medical needs. If you were born British, had a British parent when you were a child, or spent a majority of your childhood growing up in the UK, you should continue under the current system. In all other circumstances including housing, government aid of any kind should be strictly contributions-based. A huge amount of what is drawing people to the UK is incentives. If they can see people on TikTok getting houses or extended stays in four star hotels and free money, why wouldn't they want to come?
Inward legal migration should be limited to people earning over £50,000 a year. The top 20% of taxpayers pay an average of £35,000 more in taxes than they take out. Quite frankly, our stretched and strained public services need the money, and our economy needs the wealth creation.
To be honest, strict but fair should have been our policy all along.
Yeah, prayer did so much for humanity at an extremely religious time when the Black Death was wiping out half the population, how about that for a practical solution? No, not really. Anyway, I suspect that what is wanted by "the powers that be" is a compliant population that falls into their belief structures about the post-war consensus on an open society, not one that cares about borders and their own culture and being realistic about Islamism and the European Union. I suspect they're too stupid to actually want violence or war - they would look around and say "how did that happen? Oh dear, must be the Far Right. Can't be my fault, guv".
1. And you Know Prayer never worked in the 14th century. Wasn't aware you are an Expert on 14th century European history. I stand corrected (/snark)
2. For Materialist/Atheist view (which alas is all to common) it seem not to be. BUT for Believers it is A very practical solution. It is said no (18th century) religious revival in The Colonies, No American Revolution.
And a question for those Non-Believers. How's that walking away from God i(n the last 100+ years) workin out for you? Society getting better/freer?
May I recommend
The Real Reason Our Culture Is Falling Apart | Stephen Meyer Explains
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al8F1aTY2uY
Aug 1, 2025
Today's video is a reflection on the 40th anniversary of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s chilling speech, "Men Have Forgotten God." There are many sobering parallels between the collapse of spiritual life in Soviet Russia and today’s cultural crisis in America like how the rise of materialism, scientific atheism and nihilistic worldviews are contributing to a decline in faith especially among Gen Z. If you've ever wondered why belief in God seems to be fading, and what can be done about it, this is a conversation you can’t afford to miss.
3. Give It (Prayer) A Shot! What Have You Got To Lose?
I responded to a post on FB where a woman had flown from the US to Ireland to meet a guy. After reading SO MANY comments about how she should stay there because the US was so bad, I posted asking if any of those people had been paying attention to what is actually going on over there. The fact that hotels were being filled by the government with immigrants, thereby affecting tourism, while veterans lived homeless in the streets. Attacks by immigrants against children. Irish matching against the government for implementing policies not in alignment with the populace. Free speech disappearing -especially online. The two-tiered justice system.
Got quite a few responses from people in Scotland and Britain backing me up. Got way more telling me I should start writing fiction for Hollywood, that...yeah...some people are prejudice but no real Irish person was upset.
The posts backing me up are now gone. But everyday I receive notice someone has -once again - posted that I'm wrong and the US could learn from the EU and Ireland.
Sheesh.
I hope your government reads this and indeed all your articles.
Given the topic, that sounds much more like a threat than praise.
George Orwell must be rolling in his grave, screaming “Why didn’t they listen to me?!?” 😔
"Wait, what?! We're following your manual, it just takes time, you know! ... huh? What do you mean, "1984" wasn't a manual?!
Where does the impulse for this kind of legislation come from? Polls confirm it can't be from voters, yet voters elect candidates for public office who routinely impose unwanted laws on them. This raises an obvious question about the set of candidates from which voters are expected to choose: why is it limited to candidates who are almost guaranteed, if elected, to legislate in ways inimical to voters' best interests, as the voters themselves perceive them? There's something wrong, not with voters' judgment but with a system in which the criteria that need to be satisfied in order to get one's name on an election ballot have nothing to do with what voters want.
"We keep being told that some mythical far-right is stoking tensions in this country"
seeing Signs like this.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uZGulAcZRl4/maxresdefault.jpg
Surely there is some equality law that prevents this sort of discrimination?
King Arthur will return will one day return to save Britain in its time of need.
Now?
Belbury Must Be destroyed!
So if I understand this correctly, Section 44 gives government ministers (elected or unelected bureaucrats?) authority to change the rules on how the Online Safety Act is implemented. Sounds more like Animal Farm than 1984. In the U.S. the EPA gets to make decisions like that. And over the last few years I've been buying products, though not illegal, that are known by the State of Kalifornia to cause cancer. I guess I won't be using my lawn mower in Kalifornia...
So glad I left back in 1990.
Those of us who left the UK are mourning for you. We tried to warn you though, I posted over and over not to vote for Labour. But so many did to “Teach the Conservatives a lesson“. They needed a lesson but you didn’t need Labour.
The UK must find a way to get this Labour government out of power.
May God help you all.
Apt