That entire setup was more a showcase of how the notion of free speech is often used as a weapon to force a particular world view. The idea that the Palestine perspective doesn't get enough exposure in the west is just outright garbage; some people conflate lack of agreement with lack of exposure: we heard it, we don't agree, that's it; it's on the ballot, it's just not being voted for.
Not a bad debate, apart from most of the audience ignoring the massive elephant in the room you tried so hard to point out... They were smug about it too.
Some of the audience, especially the young lad on the left side, seem like a good guest candidate for a conversation outside of that setting, no?
That entire setup was more a showcase of how the notion of free speech is often used as a weapon to force a particular world view. The idea that the Palestine perspective doesn't get enough exposure in the west is just outright garbage; some people conflate lack of agreement with lack of exposure: we heard it, we don't agree, that's it; it's on the ballot, it's just not being voted for.
Not a bad debate, apart from most of the audience ignoring the massive elephant in the room you tried so hard to point out... They were smug about it too.
Some of the audience, especially the young lad on the left side, seem like a good guest candidate for a conversation outside of that setting, no?
Id love to hear what were your impressions